{"id":412922,"date":"2020-01-31T12:00:22","date_gmt":"2020-01-31T12:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wncen.com\/?p=412922"},"modified":"2024-06-11T13:41:17","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T13:41:17","slug":"bitcoin-actually-declines-off-of-political-uncertainty-bombshell-study-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wncen.com\/news\/bitcoin-actually-declines-off-of-political-uncertainty-bombshell-study-finds\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Actually Declines Off of Political Uncertainty, Bombshell Study Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"
It might not be a good idea to purchase bitcoin as an insurance asset<\/a> against this year’s nailbiting US presidential election.<\/p>\n That is according to a new study that doubts bitcoin’s credential as a safe-haven asset against a mounting political uncertainty. Author Tobias Burggraf, a research assistant at\u00a0WHU\u00a0Otto Beisheim School of Management, found that the cryptocurrency’s price goes down whenever governmental risks are high<\/a>.<\/p>\n The report used two class of variables: One that concerned returns of bitcoin over a specific period of time, and the other that measured global political uncertainty (GPU) based on binaries 0 and 1. ‘One’ indicated high uncertainty when they fall within a period of six, three, or one month prior to a federal election. ‘Zero,’ on the other hand, showed low risks.<\/p>\n “The correlation between Bitcoin and political uncertainty is negative for all three variables GPU6M, GPU3M, and GPU1M (\u22120.220, \u22120.276, and \u22120.152, respectively), which gives us a first indication of the directional relationship. When political uncertainty goes up, Bitcoin’s return goes down,” \u2013 wrote Mr. Burggraf.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n Data that served as the basis to understand bitcoin’s return and GPU came from CoinMarketCap.com<\/a> and the US Federal Election Commission, respectively.<\/p>\n However, the study focused on prices and election data recorded between April 28, 2013, and October 31, 2019. Up until 2018, bitcoin’s volatility was much higher and was subject to a higher degree of price manipulation. It was only after April 2019 that the cryptocurrency started responding actively to global events (the US-China trade war<\/a> is a prime example).<\/p>\n While Mr. Burggraf’s quantile regression didn’t agree with bitcoin’s status as a safe-haven asset, a separate Bloomberg study in August 2019 said otherwise. The global financial news provider found that the cryptocurrency’s correlation with Gold<\/a>, a traditional hedging asset, reached its highest between April 2019 and July 2019.<\/p>\n The correlation efficiency between gold and bitcoin touched its four-year high in January 2020<\/a>. Both climbed almost in tandem after a US-sponsored airstrike killed a top Iranian military commander and led the Middle East on the brink of a serious geopolitical conflict.<\/p>\n Prominent market analyst Alex Kruger<\/a> spotted the growing proximity between the two assets. He saw it as a sign of bitcoin becoming a more macro asset. Excerpts:<\/p>\n “Bitcoin is in the process of becoming a macro asset as the market matures. In the meantime bitcoin is also a hedge against the TAIL-RISK of fiat systems collapsing, i.e. a put option on central banks without expiry.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n 13\/ This is how bitcoin traded the Iran events. Notice the lag. Lag = Opportunity \ud83d\udc47 pic.twitter.com\/bSK7DxlhRz<\/a><\/p>\n — Alex Kr\u00fcger (@krugermacro) January 28, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\nAnomalies<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Bitcoin’s Latest Safe-Haven Act<\/h2>\n
\n