{"id":562210,"date":"2023-12-03T14:30:26","date_gmt":"2023-12-03T14:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wncen.com\/?p=562210"},"modified":"2024-06-11T14:44:48","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T14:44:48","slug":"xrp-lawsuit-news-updates-schedule-price-predictions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wncen.com\/news\/ripple\/xrp-lawsuit-news-updates-schedule-price-predictions\/","title":{"rendered":"XRP Lawsuit: Full History, News, Schedule And Price Predictions"},"content":{"rendered":"

Few events have garnered as much attention as the ongoing lawsuit between Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) – often referred to as \u201cXRP lawsuit<\/strong>\u201d. This legal battle, which has significant implications for the broader crypto market, has seen a series of twists and turns that have kept investors and industry observers on their toes. In this article, we delve into the details of the XRP lawsuit, provide the latest updates, and explore what the future might hold for XRP price.<\/p>\n

XRP Lawsuit Overview: What Are The SEC’s Claims?<\/h2>\n

In December 2020, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, the company behind the XRP cryptocurrency, and two of its executives, Brad Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen. The SEC alleged that XRP is an unregistered security and that Ripple Labs illegally raised over $1.3 billion through its sale.<\/p>\n

The SEC’s position hinges on the application of the Howey Test, a standard derived from a 1946 Supreme Court case, to determine if a transaction qualifies as an “investment contract” and therefore should be considered a security subject to SEC regulation. The SEC argues that investors in XRP expected profits primarily from the efforts of Ripple’s management and its corporate actions, classifying XRP as a security under this framework.<\/p>\n

XRP Lawsuit: The Howey Test<\/h3>\n

The SEC’s case hinges on the Howey Test, a four-pronged test that determines whether an asset is considered a security under US law. The four prongs of the Howey Test are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. An investment of money:<\/strong> The investor must have invested money in a common enterprise.<\/li>\n
  2. A reasonable expectation of profits:<\/strong> The investor must have a reasonable expectation of profits to be derived from the investment, solely from the efforts of others.<\/li>\n
  3. Participation in a common enterprise:<\/strong> The investor must participate in a common enterprise with the promoter of the investment.<\/li>\n
  4. An expectation of profits from the efforts of others:<\/strong> The investor must have an expectation of profits from the efforts of others rather than solely from their own efforts.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The SEC argues that XRP meets all four prongs of the Howey test.<\/strong> Specifically, the SEC alleges that:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Investors purchased XRP with the expectation that its value would appreciate.<\/li>\n
    2. Ripple Labs promoted XRP as an investment opportunity.<\/li>\n
    3. XRP holders participated in a common enterprise with Ripple Labs.<\/li>\n
    4. XRP holders expected to profit from the efforts of Ripple Labs and others in the XRP ecosystem.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Ripple Labs has vehemently denied the SEC’s allegations, arguing that XRP is a utility token used for cross-border payments and not an investment contract. The company has also maintained that its sale of XRP was not an unregistered securities offering.<\/p>\n

      Ripple XRP Lawsuit: The Full History<\/h2>\n

      The legal saga between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been marked by a series of pivotal events, shaping the discourse around cryptocurrency regulation and the classification of digital assets. Below is a comprehensive timeline of the key milestones in the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit.<\/p>\n

      \"xrp<\/p>\n

      Dec. 21, 2020: SEC Files Lawsuit Against Ripple Labs<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs, Brad Garlinghouse, and Christian Larsen was a pivotal moment in the cryptocurrency industry. This was the first time the SEC took action against a major crypto company for allegedly selling unregistered securities. The SEC’s complaint alleged that Ripple Labs had raised over $1.3 billion through the sale of XRP, which it classified as an unregistered security. The SEC also alleged that Ripple Labs had engaged in ongoing sales of XRP to retail investors, further violating securities laws.<\/p>\n

      Dec. 28, 2020: Coinbase Delists XRP<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Following the lawsuit’s initiation, Coinbase, a major cryptocurrency exchange, removed XRP from its trading platform. This move was a significant reaction to the legal uncertainty surrounding XRP’s status and indicated the potential market impact of the SEC’s actions. Almost all crypto exchanges followed, delisting XRP for American clients.<\/p>\n

      Ripple XRP Lawsuit: The Year 2021<\/h3>\n

      March 3, 2021: Larsen and Garlinghouse Challenge SEC\u2019s Fair Notice<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Ripple\u2019s executives contended that the SEC did not provide adequate notice that XRP would be considered a security. This defense focused on the lack of regulatory clarity and guidance for market participants regarding the status of digital assets like XRP.<\/p>\n

      March 8, 2021: SEC Requests Immediate Hearing<\/strong><\/p>\n

      In a response to Ripple’s fair notice defense, the SEC sought a quick hearing, indicating the agency’s urgency in addressing and refuting Ripple’s claims and moving forward with the legal proceedings.<\/p>\n

      March 22, 2021: XRP Recognized For Currency Value And Utility<\/strong><\/p>\n

      Judge Sarah Netburn’s recognition of XRP\u2019s utility and currency value was a notable moment in the lawsuit. This ruling differentiated XRP from typical securities, suggesting a possible unique legal standing for XRP compared to other digital assets.<\/p>\n

      June 14, 2021: SEC\u2019s Internal Crypto Trading Policies Deadline Extended<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The court\u2019s decision to extend the deadline for the SEC to disclose its internal cryptocurrency trading policies indicated the complexity and sensitivity of the information expected, which could potentially impact the case’s direction.<\/p>\n

      Aug. 31, 2021: Deadline for SEC\u2019s Internal Crypto Trading Policies Disclosure<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The disclosure of these policies was anticipated to provide transparency into the SEC’s internal stance on cryptocurrencies and potential conflicts of interest, which could have implications for the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

      Oct. 15, 2021: Expert Discovery Deadline<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The inclusion of expert opinions from the fields of cryptography and securities law aimed to bring technical and legal clarity to the case, potentially influencing the court\u2019s understanding of XRP’s nature.<\/p>\n

      XRP Ripple Lawsuit: The Year 2022<\/h3>\n

      Jan. 24, 2022: Extension for Sensitive Document Disclosure<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The extension allowed the SEC more time to contest the decision requiring the disclosure of sensitive documents, highlighting the critical nature of these documents in the legal battle.<\/p>\n

      Sept. 17, 2022: Motions for Summary Judgment Filed<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The filing of summary judgment motions by both parties was a crucial step in the legal process, summarizing their arguments and legal positions, and moving the case closer to a resolution.<\/p>\n

      Sept. 21, 2022: Chamber of Digital Commerce Granted Amicus Curiae Brief Filing<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The court\u2019s permission for the Chamber of Digital Commerce to file an amicus curiae brief brought an additional perspective from a key blockchain advocacy group, potentially influencing the court’s understanding of the broader industry context.<\/p>\n

      Dec. 2, 2022: Replies to Summary Judgment Motions Made Public<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The public release of these replies provided deeper insights into the legal strategies and arguments of both the SEC and Ripple, clarifying the stakes and positions in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n

      Dec. 22, 2022: SEC\u2019s Attempt to Prevent Public Release of Hinman Documents<\/strong><\/p>\n

      The SEC’s efforts to block the release of the Hinman documents underscored their potential significance in clarifying the SEC\u2019s internal views and policies regarding digital assets like XRP.<\/p>\n

      Ripple Clinches Four Victories: The Year 2023<\/h3>\n
      \"Ripple
      Ripple XRP lawsuit<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      #1: June 12, 2023: Hinman Documents Unsealed And Made Public<\/h4>\n

      The Hinman emails were released<\/a> in the SEC Ripple case on June 13, 2023. These emails, related to former SEC director William Hinman, were part of the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs, and their release had been highly anticipated for months.<\/p>\n

      The documents included exchanges between Hinman and Ethereum founders Vitalik Buterin and Joe Lubin. They revealed that Hinman ignored instructions from high-ranking SEC officials in preparation for his June 14, 2018 speech, where he discussed Ether and its classification as a security.<\/p>\n

      Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, stated that the Hinman documents were “well worth the wait”. The release of these emails had severe implications for the SEC’s credibility and the ongoing XRP lawsuit, and marked the first victory for Ripple.<\/p>\n

      #2: July 13, 2023: Ripple Labs Wins The Summary Judgment<\/h4>\n

      Ripple Labs achieved its second, although partial victory in its legal battle with the SEC. The US District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the sale of Ripple\u2019s XRP tokens on exchanges and through algorithms did not constitute investment contracts. This was a significant decision because it implied that these sales were not subject to federal securities laws.<\/p>\n

      However, the court found that Ripple’s direct sales of XRP to institutional buyers, hedge funds, and other parties were in violation of federal securities laws. These institutional sales, amounting to approximately $770 million, were deemed as unregistered offers and sales of investment contracts. The court’s ruling was based on the expectation that investors in these institutional sales would profit from Ripple’s efforts to promote and increase the value of XRP.<\/p>\n

      \"Ripple
      Ripple CEO Garlinghouse and CLO Alderoty in front of the SEC building | Source: X @bgarlinghouse<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      This ruling was notable because it provided some clarity on the circumstances under which digital assets like XRP could be considered securities. For the programmatic sales through exchanges and algorithms, the court found no evidence that a reasonable buyer would have the expectation of profits derived from the efforts of Ripple\u2019s management.<\/p>\n

      This aspect of the ruling was a relief for Ripple, as it suggested that regular sales of XRP to general investors did not violate securities laws. The court’s decision not to grant the SEC’s motion for summary judgment on the “aiding and abetting” claim against Ripple executives Larsen and Garlinghouse further bolstered Ripple’s position\u200b.<\/p>\n

      #3: October 3, 2023: Judge Torres Denies SEC\u2019s Interlocutory Appeal<\/h4>\n

      The SEC’s interlocutory appeal against Ripple was denied on October 3, 2023. The decision marked the third consecutive loss for the SEC in its legal battle with Ripple, where Judge Torres rejected the SEC’s attempt to appeal its loss against Ripple, setting the stage for further proceedings in the case.<\/p>\n

      #4: October 19, 2023: SEC Drops Claims Against Ripple Labs Executives<\/h4>\n

      In its fourth loss to Ripple, the SEC dropped charges against Brad Garlinghouse and Christian Larsen. This left Ripple Labs as the sole defendant in the lawsuit. This decision was a surprise to many observers, as it suggested that the SEC may have been losing confidence in its case against the individual executives.<\/p>\n

      \"XRP
      Source: X @bgarlinghouse<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

      Pending: Ripple XRP Lawsuit – The Trial<\/h3>\n

      A trial date has yet to commence. The trial will be a high-stakes event for Ripple Labs, as the company could face significant penalties for its institutional sales worth $770 million which were considered unregistered securities sales. The trial is scheduled to take place between April and June 2024.<\/p>\n

      The remedies phase will determine the appropriate fine for Ripple’s past institutional sales of XRP, valued at $770 million. The SEC will seek the entire amount as penalties. Ripple might attempt to reduce this figure by arguing for the exclusion of legitimate business expenses and XRP sales outside the United States\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\n

      XRP Wins Lawsuit: But What About Remedies?<\/h2>\n

      John E. Deaton’s Analysis<\/h3>\n

      John E. Deaton, who acted as amicus curiae in the XRP lawsuit, expressed strong confidence in Ripple\u2019s success in the ongoing lawsuit with the SEC. He predicted<\/a> that Ripple has a 99.1% chance of winning, contingent on agreeing to a fine not exceeding $20 million. Deaton argued that the SEC could not demand significant disgorgement without proving harm to investors.<\/p>\n

      In his analysis he also emphasized that the people who viewed the SEC\u2019s victory as 50-50 were mistaken. He suggested that it was more like a 90-10 win in Ripple\u2019s favor. According to Deaton, if Ripple ends up paying a fine of $20 million or less, it would represent a near-total legal victory\u200b\u200b.<\/p>\n

      Jeremy Hogan’s Analysis<\/h3>\n

      Jeremy Hogan, another pro-XRP attorney, recently provided insights<\/a> into the potential arguments Ripple might use during the remedies briefing. Hogan referred to the SEC v. Liu case, which emphasized that disgorgement should be “fair” and based on the violator\u2019s net profits rather than gross. He suggested that Ripple is likely to deduct its legitimate business expenses from any potential penalties.<\/p>\n

      \n
      \n
      \n

      Hogan also pointed out that sales outside the SEC\u2019s US jurisdiction could be excluded from the total sum. This could seriously affect the penalties’ final amount. Additionally, he mentioned that disgorgement should go to those who experienced financial losses, namely individuals or entities that suffered investment losses.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

      If an XRP holder acquired the cryptocurrency at a lower price than its current value, they would not qualify as victims, thus challenging the SEC’s case for disgorgement. Hogan concluded, “In conclusion, $770 million is NOT going to be $770 million, but something much less.”\u200b<\/p>\n

      XRP Lawsuit News<\/h2>\n

      As of November 2023, the ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the US SEC has entered a crucial phase. Both parties have submitted a joint proposal for the next stage of the lawsuit. This proposal focuses on the remedies briefing and discovery process. Important: Stay up to date with the latest news in the XRP lawsuit on NewsBTC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      XRP Lawsuit Next Court Dates: Upcoming Schedule<\/h3>\n

      Pro-XRP lawyer John E. Deaton has provided<\/a> the final dates for the Ripple vs. SEC case, as per the orders from US District Judge Analisa Torres. According to the schedule based on the remedies and discoveries filing:<\/p>\n