Featured image from Inside Bitcoins, chart from Tradingview.com<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Crypto analyst Ali Martinez recently provoked some thoughts in the crypto community as he highlighted a historical pattern that provides insight into where the Bitcoin price may be headed. This comes as debate continues whether or not a potential approval of the pending Spot Bitcoin ETF applications is a \u2018sell-the-news\u2019 event.\u00a0 Is History Set To Repeat Itself? In a post on his X (formerly Twitter) platform, Martinez noted that Bitcoin had a bearish January the last two times it saw a strong performance in the last four months of the preceding year. If history were to repeat itself, Bitcoin\u2019s price could decline this month, considering that it ended the last four months in 2023 on a high.\u00a0 Related Reading: Bitcoin Spot ETF: Bitwise Closes Ranks With $200 Million Seed Fund The crypto analyst suggested that those bearish Januarys were likely a result of profit-taking, something which he warned could happen again based on history. Market intelligence platform Santiment recently reported that most Bitcoin holders are in profit. Therefore, the projection of a profit-taking trend in January is not far-fetched.\u00a0 This trend already seems to have begun in December, as NewsBTC reported that Bitcoin whales sold around 50,000 BTC worth $2.2 billion. While a bearish January is expected based on history, there is also the argument that those last two years didn\u2019t have any event as bullish as the Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which could be approved as early as this week.\u00a0 This argument also leads to another discussion on whether approval of these funds by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will cause Bitcoin\u2019s price to pump or dump. So far, crypto analysts have been divided on what is likely to happen. Based on certain predictions, Bitcoin could either rise to as high as $69,000 or crash to as low as $35,000.\u00a0 Initial Impact Of Spot Bitcoin ETFs Are Overestimated VanEck\u2019s advisor, Gabor Gurbacs, recently opined that the short-term expectations over a Spot Bitcoin ETF are overestimated. Analysts like Galaxy Digital predict that these funds could see inflows of up to a billion in their first month of launching. However, Gurbacs begs to differ as he predicts that only a few $100 million would flow into these funds in the short term.\u00a0 Related Reading: XRP Price Surge: Crypto Analyst Predicts Various Bullish Scenarios In The Coming Days The amount of inflows that could move into these funds initially is significant, considering the impact it could also have on Bitcoin\u2019s price. Trading firm QCP Capital had predicted that Bitcoin could revisit its all-time high of $69,000 if these Spot Bitcoin ETFs see enough capital in their first few weeks of trading.\u00a0 Meanwhile, in the long term, Gurbacs is bullish on the impact these ETFs will have. He predicts that Bitcoin could experience a similar growth to the one Gold enjoyed upon the launch of Gold ETFs. Gold\u2019s market cap has grown exponentially since the first Gold ETF launched in 2004. Bitcoin\u2019s market cap could also run into trillions with the help of these Spot Bitcoin ETFs. Featured image from Inside Bitcoins, chart from Tradingview.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":594,"featured_media":567569,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[428,656,679,1119,89185,1144,78790,6664,14690],"class_list":["post-567568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitcoin-news","tag-bitcoin-price","tag-btc","tag-btc-news","tag-btcusd","tag-btcusdt","tag-crypto","tag-crypto-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Crypto Analyst Says History Shows What Might Be Next For Bitcoin, But Is It Good Or Bad?<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n